House approves business tax cut rather than funding education
Date Posted: 5/08/2013 | Author: Jennifer Mitchell, CAE
Last night, the Texas House passed House Bill (HB) 500, which provides over $666 million in tax cuts for businesses. The business franchise tax, created for the purpose of funding public education, has never produced the amount of revenue it promised. In fact, the franchise tax has caused a structural deficit in the state budget, which grows with every year that the tax underperforms, effectively underfunding public education at the state level and forcing higher local property taxes to make up the difference. Despite the fact that the current proposed budget is not even close to restoring the education cut from last session, the Texas House chose to pass a tax cut for business special interests. The bill, offered by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Harvey Hilderbran (R-Kerrville) makes numerous adjustments to the business franchise tax that will take more than $666 million from the state budget. The bill now heads to the Senate and, if passed, will go to a conference committee to determine which businesses will receive these tax cuts. HB 500 was not included in the budget that passed in both houses, so decisions made on this bill will drive all other budget decisions for the state budget conference committee. That means money will have to be taken from other parts of the budget—including public education—to pay for the bill, if it becomes law.
CONVERSATION
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
10/24/2025
Teach the Vote’s Week in Review: Oct. 24, 2025
ATPE weighs in as TEA takes over Fort Worth ISD. Plus: Early voting continues through Friday, Oct. 31.
10/23/2025
From The Texas Tribune: Texas Education Agency takes over Fort Worth ISD, replacing its elected school board
The North Texas district is the 11th since 2000 to be taken over by the state and the second largest after Houston ISD.
10/22/2025
Federal judge permanently blocks HB 900, the READER Act
The Western District Court of Texas sided with booksellers and publishers arguing that requiring them to rate books for sexual content violated the U.S. Constitution.