Senate Finance Committee to take up TEA funding
Date Posted: 1/23/2013 | Author: Jennifer Mitchell, CAE
The Senate Finance Committee is wasting no time getting the budget process rolling. Just a couple of days after being named, the committee is meeting this morning to discuss the state’s revenue projection, the constitutional spending cap, and several agencies in article III of the state budget, including the Texas Education Agency (TEA). ATPE will testify before the committee later this afternoon. “The state of Texas is projected to accrue more in tax collections than at any point in history, yet the Senate public education budget still does not fund public education at 2011 levels,” says ATPE Lobbyist Josh Sanderson. “I will be telling the Finance Committee why it is imperative that we make the necessary investment in public education to achieve the results that are required of our schools, educators, and students.” Both the Texas House and Senate filed their respective base budget bills for the session last week. Both proposals are very conservative and do little to restore the massive cuts in education funding enacted last session despite the nearly $9 billion budget surplus recently announced by the comptroller. “The state has more than enough money to pay back the $5 billion in cuts made in 2011. The question is do they have the will,” said Sanderson. Stay tuned for updates as the budget process progresses. The committee is scheduled to take up TRS funding tomorrow.
CONVERSATION
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
10/24/2025
Teach the Vote’s Week in Review: Oct. 24, 2025
ATPE weighs in as TEA takes over Fort Worth ISD. Plus: Early voting continues through Friday, Oct. 31.
10/23/2025
From The Texas Tribune: Texas Education Agency takes over Fort Worth ISD, replacing its elected school board
The North Texas district is the 11th since 2000 to be taken over by the state and the second largest after Houston ISD.
10/22/2025
Federal judge permanently blocks HB 900, the READER Act
The Western District Court of Texas sided with booksellers and publishers arguing that requiring them to rate books for sexual content violated the U.S. Constitution.